Describe a positive thing a family member has done for you.
I believe all humans have made a or many not-so-good decision(s) while navigating this thing called life.
I’ve heard that blood is thicker than water. When comes to family – blood is sometimes thicker only if you choose to drink it.
An individual member may behave in the following manners:
Passive – will never cause a disruption
Aggressive – loud haughty always right
Busybody – knows everything about everyone – can’t hold water in a cup with a cap
Selfish – don’t even ask that one – for the time of day –  the response would be you don’t have a watch as old as you are?
Truth Seeker- she address anyone young or old if she sees or heard about something that is wrong, unsafe, has negative consequences to name a few: she will not offer something she saw on social media or gossip: she does not care how the information is responded to by others: she is careful to check her motives at the door: when she has information to disclose it most assuredly comes from learned experiences – sometimes backed up by thorough research guided by the Holy Spirit. That means the information is NEVER INTENDED to cause harm – but hopefully circumvent harm and to inform the person. Often the information is rejected with harsh words, refusal to engage. That’s the painful price for truth-seekers.
There have been several instances when information (unsolicited information-she does not care – when delivered in the family dynamics) was rejected and the consequences come through loud and clear- yet the recipient doesn’t acknowledge either out of fear, guilt, anger, shame or maybe they haven’t identified the connection – OR perhaps for whatever personal reason – one of my vices is used as global permission slip to reject my verbal concern.
Just this morning a family member created a create a nickname which to me was derogatory and painful because it was a label for one of my vices I struggled with for a long time.
Just this morning that family member called me, by and loving and caring phrase – immediately the weight of the disrespect that I carried instantly disappeared.
A 7-billion-dollar industry that in prior years one would have to purchase a separate airline ticket to travel with a cello. A new company just received investors to fund the printing of cellos – with individual specifications. That confirms the population of folk that attend events w-that include classical music performed with an orchestra is alive and well in spite of the destruction of The Kennedy Center.
🎻 How Many Orchestra‑Type Concerts Are Still Active?
Global Volume of Live Orchestral Performances
According to Bachtrack’s 2025 classical‑music statistics the most comprehensive global dataset available:
31,455 total live events (concerts, opera, dance) were documented in 2025.
This includes thousands of orchestral concerts across Europe, North America, and Asia.
Germany alone hosted 123 orchestral concerts, the highest of any country in the dataset.
This is the clearest indicator that the orchestral ecosystem is not shrinking it’s stabilizing and in some regions expanding.
🎼 Who’s Performing the Most?
Chicago Symphony Orchestra, Berlin Philharmonic, and Vienna Philharmonic were among the most active orchestras in 2025.
Top conductors logged 80–120+ engagements per year, showing high demand for live symphonic programming.
🎧 Audience Trends – Post‑Pandemic Recovery
The Royal Philharmonic Orchestra’s 2024 report shows:
Audiences returned confidently to concert halls in 2023–2024 after pandemic declines.
The orchestral audience is diversifying, with new listeners discovering classical music through streaming and digital platforms.
There is no decline in appetite for symphonic repertoire — it remains the core of classical programming.
3D‑Printed Cellos Fit a Real Pain Point
If the new company can:
Meet acoustic standards,
Reduce weight,Rreduce travel risk,
Offer customization,
…it taps directly into a market where international mobility is a constant requirement.
Audiences returned confidently to concert halls in 2023–2024 after pandemic declines.
The orchestral audience is diversifying, with new listeners discovering classical music through streaming and digital platforms.
There is no decline in appetite for symphonic repertoire — it remains the core of classical programming.
🎻 Why This Matters for the Cello Industry
Here’s the connection:
✈️ Travel Burden = Market Opportunity
Professional cellists often:
Fly internationally for tours.
Pay for an extra seat for the instrument.
Face insurance, climate‑control, and transport risks.
With 31,455 live events and heavy touring by top orchestras, the demand for:
lighter instruments,
travel‑safe alternatives,
or custom‑printed performance‑grade cellos
…is structurally supported by the volume of global performances.
History of The Kennedy Center
In 1955, recognizing America’s need to take its place on the world’s cultural stage, President Dwight D. Eisenhower established a commission for a new public auditorium in the nation’s capital. Three years later, he signed the National Cultural Center Act (Pub. L. No. 85-874). In signing this act, President Eisenhower confirmed the inherent value of the arts to all Americans, and created what would ultimately become the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts—a true ‘artistic mecca,’ and one of the world’s most respected organizations.
⭐ Summary of the Main Points
1. Trump announces a two‑year shutdown of the Kennedy Center
President Trump declares the Kennedy Center in Washington, D.C. will close for “renovations.”
The announcement is abrupt and raises immediate suspicion about his motives.
2. Salon writer Amanda Marcotte argues the shutdown is retaliatory
Marcotte frames Trump’s behavior as reactive and punitive comparing it to the logic of a “jealous wife‑beater.”
Her thesis: Trump is shutting the center down because his attempt to align himself with national culture failed.
3. Artists distanced themselves from the Kennedy Center
After the center became closely associated with Trump, many performers refused to participate.
Ticket sales dropped sharply.
Instead of accepting this rejection, Marcotte argues Trump chose to retaliate.
4. Marcotte warns Trump may intend to demolish the building
Trump volunteered, unprompted, “I’m not ripping it down,” which Marcotte interprets as a tell.
She argues that such a defensive denial suggests the opposite — that demolition is on the table.
Trump also described the building being “fully exposed” to steel beams and removing marble and steel, which she sees as destructive rather than restorative.
5. She cites a precedent: the East Wing demolition
Trump previously promised that building a White House ballroom would not damage the existing structure.
Shortly afterward, he demolished the historic East Wing without warning.
Marcotte uses this as evidence that his reassurances cannot be taken at face value.
6. The Kennedy Center episode reflects a broader MAGA cultural pattern
Marcotte argues this incident is part of a larger trend:
Censoring comedians
Banning books
Targeting drag performances
Punishing cultural spaces that reject MAGA ideology
Her overarching claim: The movement cannot create culture, so it seeks to destroy or suppress the culture it cannot control.
You must be logged in to post a comment.