This is just a draft first to say my apologies for my crazy looking website. Second second second OK look at that. I did not say second three times as it appears using talk to text number three wonder why it didn’t actually put that miracle representation of the number three considering this should be a list so there’s that but talk to text. I wonder if they thought about oh look at that it did say talk twice and sometimes it corrects itself sometimes it’s a trap but you know what it’s looking just like I wanted to. I’ll be back in a few gonna see if at some point during normal Wagoner I can get World Press on the line find out exactly what’s going on. Seems all over cooperation but maybe your first introduction to Customer Service and sometimes they run naked and neck. both are terrible. I’ll be back. Have a good day and a better one tomorrow. 
Category: News
-
Good Night Diane Keaton
Good Night Diane Keaton
October 12, 2025 – MsConcerned’s ManifestoDiane Keaton, an acclaimed American actress, has had a fascinating personal and professional journey. Despite being linked to several high-profile relationships—including Woody Allen, Warren Beatty, and Al Pacino—Keaton never married. She chose a path of independence, focusing on her career and personal interests.
Her decision to remain unmarried wasn’t a rejection of love—it was a quiet declaration of autonomy. In a culture that often equates fulfillment with partnership, Keaton stood firm in her own rhythm. She adopted children, built a remarkable career, and cultivated a life rich with art, architecture, and introspection.
Keaton’s legacy isn’t just in her films—it’s in her refusal to conform. She wore what she wanted, loved whom she chose, and never apologized for her solitude. That kind of clarity is rare. That kind of woman deserves a good night salute.
So tonight, we honor Diane Keaton—not just for the roles she played, but for the life she authored. Unmarried. Unapologetic. Unforgettable.
-
George Clooney’s HBO Documentary Sparks Political Turmoil Over Ohio State Abuse Scandal
George Clooney’s latest collaboration with HBO, Surviving Ohio State, dives into the decades-long sexual abuse scandal involving former university physician Richard Strauss, accused of assaulting over 300 athletes. Directed by Oscar winner Eva Orner, the film centers survivors’ voices while exposing institutional complicity.
But the documentary has triggered a political maelstrom.
President Donald Trump reportedly urged White House staff to “give Clooney a pass” on past allegations—including claims of retaliation against actress Vanessa Marquez. Staffers who resisted say they faced threats and retaliation. Meanwhile, Clooney remains defiant, stating his focus is on truth—not appeasement.
Representative Jim Jordan, who served as assistant wrestling coach at Ohio State during Strauss’s tenure, is a central figure in the film. Multiple survivors allege Jordan knew about the abuse and did nothing. Jordan declined to participate in the documentary, but his name surfaces repeatedly in survivor accounts. One wrestler recalls Jordan saying, “It’s Strauss. You know what he does”.
Jordan, now Chair of the House Judiciary Committee, had launched impeachment proceedings against President Biden, citing vague allegations of misconduct. His tactics include threats against prosecutors and efforts to discredit investigations into Trump’s legal troubles.
Adding fuel to the fire, newly appointed FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi have issued sweeping law-and-order mandates:
- Patel pledged to pursue threats “in every corner of this planet,” regardless of identity or affiliation.
- Bondi issued 14 DOJ memos eliminating DEI programs, reinstating the federal death penalty, and warning staff that dissent could lead to termination.
Both officials emphasized that justice would be blind to political status—yet their current actions reflect a weaponized agenda.
Despite rumors, Surviving Ohio State is not a Netflix production. It premiered on HBO and is streaming on Max. The confusion may stem from its cinematic scope and Clooney’s Hollywood clout, but the platform is firmly HBO.
Promises made promises kept….
-
What Happened To the News Media
Update August 3, 2026
Taking a break from the #FakeNews In a tense exchange with journalist Terry Moran, the President of the United States defends the use of a photo shopped image—purporting to show MS-13 markings on the hand of Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a man forcibly returned to the U.S. after deportation. The image, meant to evoke ties to gang activity, sets the stage for former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi’s explosive claims.
Bondi accuses Garcia of playing a central role in a violent human smuggling ring—one that allegedly made over a hundred illicit trips across borders and ferried women, children, and suspected gang members into the country. According to a grand jury, Garcia is linked to the widespread movement of MS-13 affiliates and thousands of undocumented migrants. More disturbingly, he is alleged to have trafficked minor children, trading their innocence for profit.
The indictment goes even further: Garcia is reportedly connected to the same smuggling operation responsible for the deaths of more than 50 migrants in 2021. With accusations this serious—and the media’s rush to amplify visual narratives without rigorous fact-checking—the question emerges: Who controls the truth, and what happens when propaganda overshadows evidence?
The Failure to Fact-Check
We all know the injustice when folk receive extremely different sentences for the same crime. Now we have become comfortable with NOT knowing why the media presents misinformation without fact checking immediately. For example JD Vance stating that the Hatians are eating the cats and dogs and they are illegal. First lets understand perhaps why the media may have not addressed the lies told by the Republican Party (those that engaged in the disrespect of the citizens of the United States). Let’s explore the policy created by the FCC to monitor the news and the delivery.
The Legacy of the Fairness Doctrine
The Fairness Doctrine was a policy introduced by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in 1949. It required broadcasters who held licenses to present controversial issues of public importance and to do so in a manner that fairly reflected differing viewpoints. The doctrine had two main elements:
- Coverage of Controversial Issues: Broadcasters had to devote some of their airtime to discussing controversial matters of public interest.
- Balanced Presentation: Broadcasters had to air contrasting views regarding those matters. This could be done through news segments, public affairs shows, or editorials.
The Fairness Doctrine was abolished in 1987, and the FCC removed the rule from the Federal Register in 2011. The policy was intended to ensure that viewers were exposed to a diversity of viewpoints, but it was also criticized for being burdensome and infringing on free speech.
The Responsibility of the Media
The role of media in shaping public perception has become increasingly complex, especially in the age of rapid information dissemination. One area that has drawn particular scrutiny is how media outlets sometimes contribute to the spread of misinformation by failing to engage in thorough fact-checking processes before broadcasting or publishing content. In an effort to attract viewers and generate engagement, many media companies opt to use video clips that capture sensational events or statements. However, without immediate verification of the facts surrounding these clips, the narrative constructed around them can often deviate sharply from reality.Video clips, especially those containing emotionally charged imagery or statements, have a powerful influence on viewers. They evoke strong reactions and can frame issues in a way that favors one perspective or another. When the media broadcasts such clips without first confirming their accuracy, they risk amplifying false narratives that can have serious repercussions. This phenomenon has been widely observed in instances ranging from political campaigns to breaking news events, where initial reports based on unverified footage can lead to widespread misconceptions and erroneous conclusions among the public. The split-second decision to prioritize content over clarity results in a landscape where misinformation can thrive.
Moreover, the consequences of such practices extend beyond individual stories. When media outlets inadvertently propagate falsehoods, they contribute to a broader environment of distrust in journalism and in institutions. Audiences may become skeptical not only of certain narratives but of the media as a whole, obscuring important truths and sidelining factual discourse. In an era where misinformation proliferates online, the responsibility of the media to fact-check and verify reports is more crucial than ever. By applying rigorous standards for verification before sharing video content, media organizations can mitigate the risks of misinformation and foster a more informed public. Ultimately, the challenge lies in maintaining the delicate balance between timely reporting and the integrity of information—a responsibility that will continue to shape trust in media going forward.
Faith and False Narratives
The intertwining of religion and politics has long been a potent force in American society, but the phenomenon observed during Trump’s presidency brings to light a particularly troubling dynamic. Many of Trump’s followers viewed him through a quasi-religious lens, even going so far as to refer to him as “Jesus.” This elevation of a political figure to divine status raises significant questions about due diligence on the part of the media and the public’s discernment. Instead of fostering informed discussions, a substantial segment of the media appeared to overlook the implications of such rhetoric, failing to critically assess or challenge the conflation of faith and political allegiance. This negligence contributed to a distorted narrative where allegiance to Trump’s agenda often overshadowed fundamental biblical principles.Furthermore, the biblical characterization of Satan as the author of lies and confusion resonates powerfully in this context. The proliferation of disinformation by the GOP appeared to amplify the very confusion and denial that kept many supporters from recognizing the potential consequences of their loyalty to Trump. Issues such as losing healthcare or deteriorating living conditions—a reality that could adversely impact their families—became secondary to the fervent emotional commitment to a leader perceived as a savior. This religious fervor, coupled with a dispassionate media environment, may indeed reflect a societal shift towards embracing ideology over facts, where individuals were more inclined to accept comforting narratives over disconcerting truths.
The failure of the media to confront and critically evaluate this religious-political amalgamation compounds the challenge of fostering discourse predicated on honesty and clarity. When influential voices permit disinformation to persist unchallenged, the potential for reasoned decision-making among the public diminishes significantly. In a democratic society, where informed voting is paramount, the dangers of such a scenario cannot be underestimated. As the intersections of faith, truth, and political identity continue to evolve, it remains essential for both media and citizens to engage with these facets responsibly, ensuring that compassion and critical thinking coexist constructively in the civic sphere.
Main Stream Media Gone Awry Courtesy of David Feldman & MsConcerned’s Helper “When loyalty to a man eclipses the tenets of faith, the media’s silence becomes complicity.”
Source –
Feldman, D. [DavidFeldman]. (n.d.). YouTube channel. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/@DavidFeldman
New York Post. (2024, November). CNN bans pro-Trump commentator for ‘beeper’ joke aimed at Muslim journalist Mehdi Hasan [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvNoCwbYY6o
David Feldman – David Feldman delivers the news with the kind of tenacity you need for a daily uphill trek in steel-toed boots. As chaos threatens to drop from every corner of the sky, Feldman doesn’t flinch—he gathers the pieces, wrings out the confusion, and repackages the mess in just about an hour. His digestible format makes sense of the senseless, all while keeping his audience awake and thinking. Hop off the corporate media express and catch the trolley to his site—it’s independent, engaging, and free of charge.
-
Target, The Boycott and the Big Payback
When a leading Black faith institution accepts a corporate donation, the impact reverberates far beyond the sanctuary walls. That’s exactly what happened when the National Baptist Convention (NBC) accepted a $300,000 contribution from Target—setting off a storm of controversy that now grips the intersection of faith, finance, and social justice.
At the heart of the backlash is a simple but profound question: Can a faith-led community afford to accept support from a corporation accused of retreating from its public commitments to diversity, equity, and inclusion? For some, the answer is a resounding no.
With Pastor Jamal Bryant leading a 40-day boycott, joined by voices like Roland Martin, critics argue that the Convention’s partnership with Target signals a troubling willingness to exchange moral clarity for modest funding. While NBC President Dr. Boise Kimber champions the donation’s potential for scholarships and community programs, detractors view the gesture as emblematic of performative allyship—especially when juxtaposed with Target’s $4 billion in annual profits.
This moment isn’t just about a donation. It’s about trust, integrity, and the challenge of maintaining prophetic witness in a corporate age. The stakes are high—and the questions raised here ripple across every pew, boardroom, and pulpit concerned with justice.
-
Are U.S. Borders Really Drug-Free? An Exploration
It’s being reported that the borders are no longer a major avenue for drug trafficking. But I’ve only ever seen the Mexico border — not Canada, not New York, not Alaska, not any of the states along the northern line. Are those borders suddenly clean too? Are there even functional border checkpoints on the East and West coasts? Is Florida’s coastline “closed for business” now?
Meanwhile, airport security is working like calm, focused professionals. They’re patient, respectful, and not screaming at passengers. Nobody is being thrown on the floor, dragged off a plane, or sprayed just for walking through the terminal. Even when someone is carrying something questionable, they handle it like human beings doing their job — they check it, they address it, and if they’re wrong, they apologize. No drama. No unnecessary arrests. No treating people like criminals just because they “look suspicious.”
-
Old Glory Bank Cancels Melania tRump’s DNA
The article discusses the controversy surrounding Old Glory Bank’s decision to sever ties with Melania Trump. Melania alleges that the bank’s actions were politically motivated, claiming her charitable efforts, including scholarships for foster children, suffered as a result. She frames this as an example of “cancel culture” affecting her personal and philanthropic endeavors.
-
Eradicating Bias: Implications for Non-Christian Communities
Eradicating
Eradicating means completely removing or destroying something, often to the point where it no longer exists. In a church in Phoenix, Trump chants were heard. Trump has told over 30,000 lies in his first four years; he couldn’t name one favorite scripture; he removed anything to do with diversity, changed the name of a military base back to a Confederate general. The racist and derogatory terms he used, such as “Black guys counting my money! I hate it” or calling Omarosa a “dog”, he put every unqualified person such as alcoholics, rapists, pedophiles, heroin addicts, edlection denyers, he released the convicts from January 6th insurrection -one convict had images of children alll over his computer which was his first charge. he wants to remove federa funding if a school requests vaccine (Note: the flu is out of control, bird flue is up, measeals is up and he killed the AID program tht provides food and AIDS medicine to babies.
Executive Order
He has dubbed himself as a “King” in a fake Times cover. According to the Bible, our dependence on God and our role as His creation. We are called to acknowledge our dependence on God and embrace our role as His creation, rather than claiming divinity for ourselves.
Possible Impact
1. Potential for Discrimination :this law might enable businesses and individuals to refuse services based on religious objections, which could lead to discrimination against non-Christian communities.
2. Religious Hierarchy : By prioritizing Christian rights, the law may create a religious hierarchy, potentially marginalizing other religious and secular groups.
3. Legal Challenges : The law could lead to numerous legal battles as non-Christian communities and civil rights organizations challenge its constitutionality and its impact on anti-discrimination protections.
4. Cultural and Social Tensions : The law might deepen cultural and social divisions, as different groups clash over the balance between religious freedom and civil rights.
5. Impact on Public Institutions : There are concerns that public institutions, such as schools and workplaces, might become places of religious influence rather than neutral environments, which could affect non-Christian individuals.
With that said are the #Evangeiicals going to tame him or is this just what it is [quid pro quo] we got you the votes – we want to heard by law! I woud be remiss if I didn’t mention or ask – What Who do the #Evangeiicals serve that they would put more trust in man than in #God the alfa and omega God of ALL Gods – there shall be no others!!!!
Overall, while the law aims to protect Christian rights, it raises significant concerns about its broader implications for religious diversity and equality in the United States.
Reference
Trump’s new law for Christians changes everything – Here’s what you need to know! [Video]. (2025, February 20). YouTube. https://youtu.be/onPpjkYy4jQ?si=vuNWwT_9sC4ppr_f
-
Rise and Fall from Attorney General to Anchor
The House Ethics Committee found former Rep. Gaetz paid a 17-year-old girl for sex in 2017, concluding that he violated Florida’s statutory rape law. This was one of 20 instances where he paid for sex or drugs, according to the final draft of the panel’s report, which was obtained by CNN and subsequently published online by the committee.
Gaetz was initially President-elect Donald Trump’s pick to be attorney general, but he withdrew amid opposition from some Senate Republicans — as well as controversy over whether the ethics committee would or wouldn’t release its investigative report into Gaetz.
House Ethics Report Found Matt Gaetz Violated Statutory Rape Law
Through looking at tens of thousands of dollars of the Florida Republican’s personal transactions from his time in office, including on Venmo and PayPal, the committee found that he had paid more than a dozen women. The committee said that Gaetz “violated the House gift rule” during a 2018 trip to the Bahamas where he had sex with multiple women and took ecstasy. One woman told the committee that the trip was actually a “payment” for sex. The report identified multiple instances where he used ecstasy, cocaine, or cannabis.
“Nearly every young woman that the Committee interviewed confirmed that she was paid for sex by, or on behalf of, Representative Gaetz,” they wrote. The panel found that he had likely violated a variety of rules: “The Committee determined there is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz violated House Rules and other standards of conduct prohibiting prostitution, statutory rape, illicit drug use, impermissible gifts, special favors or privileges, and obstruction of Congress,” panel investigators wrote.
The ethics committee investigated the allegations that he had sex with a 17-year-old. The victim told them that Gaetz paid her $400 for having sex twice at a party in 2017. At the time, she had just finished her junior year of high school. The committee found that he did not ask her age and she did not tell him.
Speaking of Ethics
Early 1990s
Trump allegedly groped Kristin Anderson at a night club; she says he put his hand up her skirt. “He did touch my vagina through my underwear, absolutely,” she told the Washington Post. (Hope Hicks, as a spokesperson for the Trump campaign dismissed the account: “Mr. Trump strongly denies this phony allegation by someone looking to get some free publicity.”)
1997 – Teen USA
Trump allegedly walked into the dressing room of his Teen Miss USA contest, telling half-naked contestants as young as 15 year olds, “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before,” according to BuzzFeed. (Trump did not respond to this allegation.)
“There is substantial evidence that Representative Gaetz engaged in sexual activity with a 17-year-old girl,” reads the committee’s report, which adds that evidence suggests Gaetz did not know her age at the time. However, the report continues, “After he learned that Victim A was a minor, he maintained contact and less than 6 months after she turned 18, he met up with her again for commercial sex.”
The committee found that Gaetz violated multiple state laws pertaining to sexual misconduct. However, it found that he did not violate federal sex trafficking laws. While he did transport women across state lines for sex, the committee found that none were under 18, and none were forced or coerced. He had previously faced a sex trafficking probe by the Department of Justice — which Trump initially wanted him to lead. The investigation did not end with any charges against Gaetz.
The investigation encountered several women who were “clear at first contact that they feared retaliation or were unwilling to voluntarily relive their interactions with Representative Gaetz.” One woman said: “I think about it all the time … . I still see him when I turn on the TV and there’s nothing anyone can do. It’s frustrating to know I lived a reality that he denies.” 0
One woman said that the use of drugs could have “impair(ed their) ability to really know what was going on or fully consent.”
On Monday, Gaetz filed to obtain a restraining order against the House Ethics Committee in the hopes that it would stop the panel from releasing the report. He accused the committee of an “unethical” probe into the life of a private citizen. He said the report included “potentially defamatory allegations.” It is rare for the House Ethics Committee to release a report about a former member of Congress, but the committee did so Monday.
Gaetz has denied the allegations, including that he had sex with a minor. “In my single days, I often sent funds to women I dated — even some I never dated but who asked. I dated several of these women for years,” Gaetz posted on X last week. “It’s embarrassing, though not criminal, that I probably partied, womanized, drank, and smoked more than I should have earlier in life. I live a different life now.”
The former congressman is set to join the conservative One America News Network as an anchor next month.
NOT ARREST FOR TRUMP, GAETZ, JORDAN, SON IN LAW, DAUGHTER, GREEN, BOEBART, RICK SCOTT,
What’s New
Former Florida Congressman Gaetz has denied allegations set to be detailed in a House Ethics Committee report, while also threatening to “expose” alleged sexual misconduct claims involving his former colleagues.
In a pair of statements released Wednesday, Gaetz said he never had sex with anyone under the age of 18, a claim that had been investigated by the House Ethics Committee. The panel voted on Wednesday to release its report on Gaetz.
Gaetz also suggested he could still get sworn into the 119th Congress and then file a privileged motion to “expose every ‘me too’ settlement paid using public funds (even those involving former members).”
.
