Law & Order $354

Trump Civil Trial

NEW YORK — A judge on Friday ordered former president Donald Trump to pay more than $350 million in penalties, plus interest, following a civil fraud trial, finding that he and others had carried out a years-long scheme to use “blatantly false financial data” to borrow money at lower rates.

“Their complete lack of contrition and remorse borders on pathological,” Engoron, who heard the case without a jury, said in a written decision.

Trump, in a statement, called the decision “a Complete and Total SHAM,” while his attorneys pledged to appeal what they called “a draconian and unconstitutional fine.” Engoron ordered Trump to pay more than $354 million in penalties.

His son and son-in-law were ordered to pay $4 million each, there goes Jared’s $8 billion from the Saudis and Jr. who couldn’t remember any involvement in the business – well I dunno!

Law & Order

Remember the GOP’s phrase Law & Order – let’s define what they really mean:

When Republicans talk about “law and order”, they evoke a powerful phrase—one that has resonated with voters for decades. But what does it truly mean? Let’s delve into the layers of this loaded expression.

Historical Context:

• “Law and order” has been a staple in political discourse, projecting an image of strength and authority. It implies a commitment to maintaining societal stability through strict enforcement of laws.
• However, its interpretation has evolved, especially in recent years.

The Traditional View:

• For many conservatives, “law and order” signifies unwavering support for law enforcement. They view police officers as heroes, defenders of order, and essential to public safety.
• The subtext: punishment over rehabilitation. This approach favors harsh sentences and closed prison doors.

Challenges to the Narrative:

• George W. Bush, in response to the George Floyd protests, called for unity and self-reflection. Yet, some conservatives criticized him for not emphasizing riots and civil unrest.
• Laura Ingraham, a Fox News host, retweeted an excerpt questioning the role of bias and racism in policing. This exposed a rift within the party—between those who prioritize authority and those seeking systemic change.

Trump Era Intensification:

• Under President Trump, the phrase took on darker connotations. His tweets invoked it repeatedly, often accompanied by threats of violence.
• The cautionary subtext morphed into a warning: challenge authority at your peril.

Changing Landscape:

• Public opinion has shifted. The American people now see that when Republicans talk about “law and order”, it can lead to lawlessness and more disorder.
• The days when this slogan was a winning political message may be over.

In essence, “law and order” remains a potent phrase, but its meaning is no longer monolithic. It reflects a broader conversation about justice, policing, and societal balance.

Lets Look Back At Un-Law & Order

Donald Trump’s Involvement:

• In 1989, shortly after the Central Park jogger attack, Trump paid $85,000 for a full-page ad in four New York newspapers.
• The ad called for the reinstatement of the death penalty in New York and referenced the Central Park Five case.
• While the ad did not explicitly call for the execution of the Central Park Five, it advocated for a tough stance on crime and police power.
• Trump’s ad criticized the lack of security in New York City and portrayed a city held hostage by criminals.

Source: MSN